عنوان مقاله [English]
Hiring as one of the most important social areas in which the relationship between the tenants in the general sense with the hired in the general sense is defined below has always been a topic of interest to specialists in various sciences. One of the most important dimensions in this issue is the transfer of the right to hire from father to child, ie the replacement of a child instead of a father, for the employment of the employer and employment by the employer. In the event that applicants have the qualifications for having a job, profession and position exceeding the number of job vacancies, they have to choose between applicants. Now, in the situation where it is not possible to place a person on other persons who are qualified in one level, is it right that from the point of view of jurisprudence as a supporter of the expression of the verbs of human verbs, one can be right for a person whose father is engaged in a matter, Whether or not priority is given? In response to this question, two major facets can be imagined; First of all, this right can be left to the child in the form of a right or leave with regard to the salary, including the right of priority and therefore the child has priority in hiring. Secondly, this will result in the deprivation of other people from the occupation, and secondary titles, including injuries, are unfulfilled and the ruling will be changed. Or, in view of the interests that the ruler recognizes, in particular, in order not to accuse the Islamic system of inheritance and oppression, he can take such a right with a government order.